It's really a pleasant surprise to see some great results with a smart telescope.
What we could get from small aperture and the cheaper imaging sensor is probably the most surprising.

Maybe I shall try shorter exposure with a bigger telescope?
Let say by using a 8" SCT with reducer, try stacking 30s or 60s shots.
I am thinking about those smaller targets, distant galaxies and planetary nebula.
--
Let me summarise what I have in mind after several nights of using a smart telescope:
1. It's so easy to setup. I will set it up whenever I have clear sky, no matter the time of the day, regardless of the temperature. Setup time is zero, laziness is no longer an issue.
2. I would use the term "superlinear" gain. I will always set it up along with my bigger rig, so my observation time was doubled at least. Moreover, it increases my observation time since I will always set it up even when I have no energy to setup my bigger rig. It redefines my total observation time.
3. This is derived from (2), if the best telescope is the one that you could use most, this is probably the best telescope.
4. Paradigm shift: shorter exposure time could be compensated fairly well by extensive stacking, therefore, I am inspired to try shorter exposure with some bigger telescopes.
5. Ease of use: the prime advantage of this setup is the ease of use, so it makes not much sense for me to use it in EQ mode. In that case, I will go for my bigger setup.
6. Entry level camera: it is good as an entry level camera, but there is a catch. I am something to say here. Let say if you want to try more, you will need a big jump. I mean to invest in a cooled camera, a good equatorial mount and a pretty large aperture telescope. Going to 80mm might not show too much improvement, for something even bigger, you will want maybe 4 incher or above? That implies a much bigger mount. At maybe like several times of the cost, or you won't see much improvements.
I have to speak against myself about (5) here, if you want more, going for the EQ mode will be a natural step. It also praves a way for you to go for a bigger setup. Staying with the simplest setting has no learning curve, you learn nothing about the night sky and you learn nothing about how to set things up, not even know how to focus! I always say astronomy is about polar alignment, collimation of the optics, and focusing (對焦、對光軸、對極軸), so by using these smart telescopes, you virtually learn none of these.
7. Portability: I nearly missed this point. This super portable setup means a great chance to travel, for darker skies, or for a rare event. Bring it along with your camping trip, or even night hiking would not be a major burden.
8. Image processing: the built-in software is good enough, especially for those who really enjoy photography but not fooling around with software. As I have mentioned above, the ease of use is a prime advantage of this little stuff, so it makes not much sense for me to process the images further.
Having said that, it could pave the way for you to go for a bigger setup later.
9. Visual observation: this is a very important element, if you just want the picture, you can simply download them from the internet. There is no provision to see with your eyes is a huge downside. Getting photons light years away hitting your retina is simply the essense of amateur astronomy IMHO.
10. Exploring different targets: it will give some ideas about what you can expect before using a bigger setup for more serious observation.
--
Permanent mounting for my S30:
1. Feasibility test: mount it on my fence, tall enough to get biggest visible sky, and to stay away for the light of my neighbour.
I shall see if it's stable enough first.
2. Once it's done, I shall make a small sliding roof over it.
A solid solar panel should do the job, charge up a battery pack to be used at night.
Sliding motor powered by tuya/google home.
A rain sensor shall be installed so that it will be closed if it rains.
Sliding roof might be tuya/google home compatible.